Feminism, Abortion, Stickers
Those topics have all just collided in my mailbox. I got an order and on the front of the envelope is a sticker that says, “Women Do Regret Abortion.” Then on the back there’s another sticker that says, “As a Former Fetus I Oppose Abortion.”I’d be angry seeing these stickers anywhere. But I’m extra troubled because they’re on an order for “This Insults Women” and “A feminist was here” stickers. There are countless uses for “This Insults Women” stickers, but anti-choice messages like those are something I’d use mine on.

This has all gotten me thinking about who calls themselves feminists, who doesn’t, what feminism means, and how reproductive rights fit in.
At the NOW conference last year I went to a workshop called “I’m Not a Feminist but…” There was a great discussion on why young people with feminist ideals are hesitant or resistant to identify as "feminist." Some see feminism as a movement made up of white women with class privilege. Others prefer Alice Walker’s term “womanist.”
W O M A N I S T
“A black feminist or feminist of color. From the black folk expression of mothers to female children, 'You acting womanish,' i.e., like a woman. Usually referring to outrageous, audacious, courageous or willful behavior. Wanting to know more and in greater depth than is considered 'good' for one. Interested in grown-up doings. Acting grown up. Being grown up."
“Womanist is to feminist as purple to lavender."
-Alice Walker
In Search of our Mother’s Gardens: Womanist ProseAnd then there are still those images of feminists (man-hating, bra-burning, hairy, militant, lesbian, the list goes on and on) that some people don’t want to be associated with. It’s funny, but I’ve identified as a feminist for as long as I can remember and for a little while I secretly hoped I wouldn’t be queer because I didn’t want to satisfy people’s assumptions about feminists. I thought it would be so revolutionary to be a straight feminist. Um yeah, glad I didn’t spend too much time working on that campaign. Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of straight feminists that I admire. But I don’t find anything revolutionary about it. And the bigger lesson for me was that I was letting these stereotypes control me by trying so hard to be the opposite of them. Better to be a happy queer feminist and try to destroy the whole system of stereotypes.
Okay, but back to the whole anti-abortion feminist thing. I’m not one for wanting to exclude people or say someone isn’t really a feminist. But I don’t get people who call themselves feminists and are anti-choice, or anti-gay, or conservative. I don’t get it-- wow that was eloquent. Well bell hooks explains the conflict between feminism and anti-choice better than I can: “If feminism is a movement to end sexist oppression, and depriving females of reproductive rights is a form of sexist oppression, then one cannot be anti-choice and a feminist. A woman can insist she would never choose to have an abortion while affirming her support of the right of women to choose and still be an advocate of feminist politics. She cannot be anti-abortion and an advocate of feminism.”
What do you think?
Labels: abortion, bell hooks, feminism, NOW, sexism, stickers, this insults, womanist


9 Comments:
two things
1)Why would you be angry to see a sign that said that a woman regreted an abortion? The fact that such people exist should excite your pity, not your anger. There are multitudes of women who suffer depression over a choice they made many years ago. Studies have shown that grief over an abortion is often more traumatic over the long term than grief over a miscarriage. This is a aspect of abortion that ought to be recognised by those who advocate it, and it is detrimental to women to try to cover it up.
2)to believe that life begins at conception, and that it is wrong to terminate that life is a stance that is fully compatible with believing in equal opportunity, wages, political voice etc. To hold such a belief but have no problem with someone else terminating that life is hypocritical. It is the equivelent of saying "I believe that all people are equal and deserve freedom, therefore i won't own slaves but have no problem with the plantation owner down the street with all his slaves." people who held the first part of that belief worked (or in my view should have) actively to help the slaves down the street escape to freedom, and the world is a better place because of those who did. What you are saying is analagous to saying that they a) should have no problem with with the plantation owner, and b) if they do do, they couldn't possibly have the correct view on tarrifs. its absurd.
Hmm. In response to our anonymous friend, I would say that most feminists who personally do not believe in abortion but politically believe it should be legal and available are not as hypocritical as most people think. As a reproductive rights activist researching abortion reform in Portugal (wow, sorry for the alliteration), there are several members of Catholics For Choice (or related groups) that ideologically would not have an abortion, but understand that personal ideology should not control and deny the beliefs and freedoms of other people. Also, that the dogma of the Catholic Church is an ever-evolving thing (Ha! Catholic... evolution...) and has changed on its positions in the past as society changed.
Many, many feminists (both pro- and anti- choice) have a problem with this seeming dichotomy-- I have been one-- but I think ignoring or belittling these allies is to ignore and belittle a sincere attempt at tolerance... and tolerance, especially as it comes from those of a traditionally conservative religion, should be encouraged.
Also, your analogy is a piece of work.
Though I do commend your imagery: a poor fetus-slave kicking free of the tyrannical uterus-plantation of the collective woman...
Cough
Jeez, sorry Ariel, you had already quoted what I was trying to say:
"A woman can insist she would never choose to have an abortion while affirming her support of the right of women to choose and still be an advocate of feminist politics."
And I also have a problem with anti-choice feminists, but I think 'feminist' is such a broad term that I don't know if we can really exclude anti-choice women from it. There are disagreements and contradictions everywhere in the feminist population. It's a worthwhile question. (And I was at that conference! I bought one of your shirts.)
Believing in the right to abortion is not the same as being ok with slavery. Both take away a person's autonomy over their own body. And that is never ok.
I don't know anything about tariffs. THanks for posting this and starting this discussion, Ariel.
Oops- by "both", I meant slavery and abortion being outlawed. Not abortion itself. But o won't the opposite be argued.
you like my analogies? here's one for you -
If feminism is a movement to end sexist oppression, and teaching binary is a form of sexist oppression, then one cannot be a programmer and a feminist.
Might there possibly be a difference of opinion on the subject of the sexist oppression of binary? Oddly enough, there isn't for some. It was a rather odd form of attack that my sister encountered in a french feminism class. Apparently she was selling out to the man by pursuing their binary logic in her engineering major. Shall we purge feminist ranks of all those who follow in such sexist career paths? oh, sorry. As i have already been purged, i guess i shouldn't use that "we".
and _Aiya_. I am not equating pro-abortionists to slavers. The analogy was limited to the scope of those who believe that a fetus is a person - an individual with a soul and with an inviolable right not to be killed by anyone. Yes that is an personal ideology, and the idea that anyone should not fight to influence laws in favor of their personal ideology is absurd. It is done constantly, and is the basis for our system of government. If you can rewrite the constitution to be entirely libertarian, then you can pretend that such shenanigans are horrifying. and honestly you would be pretending.
From the standpoint of motives of an activist, the slavery analogy is a reasonable one.
An abolitionist believes in the person hood of someone who is black. Because of this personal ideology they fight to overturn someone else's right to act on the belief that they are subhuman by enslaving them.
a pro-life activist believes in the person hood of a fetus. Because of this personal ideology they fight to overturn someone else's right to act on the belief that they are subhuman by destroying him or her.
That you do not agree with the stance of the pro-life activist is not surprising, and no, i don't think it makes you pro-slavery.
the reason i brought up tariffs was that it was one of the major breaking points in the states rights debate in the civil war (no i don't believe that the civil war wasn't about slavery, it was obviously the primary reason. Tariffs and states rights were the issues that brought the 75% of the southern population that didn't own slaves into the fight).
so to clearly define the analogy
abolitionist could believe in outlawing slavery but still fight for tariffs laws that do not unfairly penalize their state.
A pro-life activist can believe in outlawing abortion and still fight for equality in a myriad of feminist issues.
that means there are a large number of women that want to do great things in ending forms of sexist oppression that span the large spectrum that you will not give the time of day to. Your idea of tolerance is to demand that they shut up about their own ideology. My idea of tolerance is to find common goals to work together outside the scope of their large gaping differences (without, i will add, demanding that they conform). I'll even give you an example - many pro-choice feminists i know loathe the organization feminists for life (well, obviously, you never like those that you've purged. hope they rot with all those "girl" engineers). As people who work with a lot of people who feel coerced into getting an abortion, either physically, economically or emotionally, one of their goals is to make a large number of choices available to fight that kind of coercion. Would your form of tolerance go so far as to work with them in establishing things like inexpensive university childcare, better information and access to adoption, fighting pregnancy discrimination and fighting for maternity coverage? Or would such a proposal make you as mad as the very idea that a woman may possibly regret having an abortion? I imagine your response will be quick to say that you already work for all sorts of things like that, without needing to sully your hands by working with all those people who could dare disagree with you about this one thing. And you are weaker for it.
Wow! I am going to feel so unsofisticated writing this after I read the first few lines of number one and two. I am thirteen and I believe that I am a complete feminist. A lot of my friends are feminists too. To me, a feminist is someone who stands up for the rights of women and doesn't back down and doesn't let peoples' insults and put-downs get to her when she (or he, I guess) is trying to stand up for themselves and other women. Women have never been treated or thought of or reported of as equally as men. To be feminist is to stand up against that. And I would just like to say that I think that even though this site shows certain opinions that some might disagree with, I think this site is amazing and if a lot of girls my age looked at it (which we might already) it would really be a great influence. Especially reading the other girls' and womens' opinions. I myself plan on getting a lot of items that you sell.
Thank you for creating this site for girls to find their confedence and try to figure out their opinions. You Rock!!
no YOU rock, anonymous #2! I am so glad to see someone so young be so passionate about feminist issues. i'm getting old, myself (almost 30 now), and it's really great when i get to hear from the next generation of feminists. you have my support, and i hope to see you emerge as a leader among your peers and your generation! Rock on, sister!
If one is a feminist or a Womanist it makes perfect sense for one to be antiabortion because abortions rid the world of 1/8 of it's females. Twenty five percent of pregnancies end in abortion. Furthermore, elective abortions in india and other countries where boys are preferred ends many MORE female lives. Boy, talk about oppressive. How will women get any further in those countries??
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home